Submitted by DougB - December 28, 2007 at 4:35 pm -0500128.187.40.28
jkdjr25,
Hey actually Paul has the best ideas for helping people caught in a bad situation.
Paul advocates re-focusing our national defenses on protecting our borders and not corportate-welfarism-Empire-building. In that respect, I feel he supports the troops and strengthening our national security more than any other candidate.
The money saved from slowing down our British-Empire-dopplegangerism would make things like Social Security and Medicaid solvent again.
Paul has said often that though he would prefer to improve the economy in ways that help less people be dependent on government aid, those programs are the absolute last on his list of programs he's uncomfortable with. This is the polar opposite of warmongers like Bush who need trillions for world conquest and collateral damage but can't spare some change for programs like S-Chip.
Finally, all this crap about Paul being a closet racist is simply crap. It's the McCain's-black-baby whisper campaign of 2008. (McCain and his wife had adopted a baby from overseas whom they loved and took good care of and Bush operatives turned it into a very effective anti-McCain lie amongst the closet racists in SC in 2004) It has been disproven again and again. The NYT ran an official retraction two days ago saying everything they checked out proved that these are decades old slanders. What is clear is that Paul is perhaps the least racist candidate running. Other than Obama who has been really impressive about not biting when haters pull the race card, I've been most impressed with Paul. Paul doesn't pull the anti-Arab card, the anti-Jew card, the white supremacist crap, or even the hispanics-are-watering-down-our-culture crap when he gets all hardline about illegal immigration. If you listen to the man himself - and not a couple fringe wackos who think they agree with him - you're likely to be impressed at that.
Anyways, I'm also surprised at the lack of Paul defense on this site. Maybe he is simply under-represented amongst gamers. That's cool with me. As much as I like the guy, I'm not sure I'd want a bunch of spam chat about politics on my server neither. But if they're cool about the 1 morning thing maybe it'll be not-so-big-a-deal. (Seems most guilds are more active at night).
My 2 cents. And nah I don't really care whether they're backed by gold or not . . . I haven't studied that issue enough. Mostly I like Paul 'cuz he's into freedom, against collateral damage and sending our 'bravest and best' into questionable enagements, backs up his craziest ideas with really interesting arguments (like the whole gold standard stuff), and just seems genuine - which is way refreshing to me. Plus he's been in Congress for 20 years and seems the best read of any of the guys (or gals) on our actual founding principles.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:04pm Freyar: I demand to see this letter! (Not that I have any grounds to demand on.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:53pm gamepolitics: JT called me a "sock puppet" in an e-mail to Hal Halpin... i gave him 24 hours to retract it, LOL
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:46pm Haggard: Might want to take a look at what Anthony Horowitz wrote about GTA IV in the Telegraph, article seems to have been taken down
Posted 07/23/08 at 01:05pm Silencets: Beutiful. I always did wonder about Jacko Wacko
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:24am Matriculated: So Jack (an anti-gay activist) PAYED for gay porn
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:22am Matriculated: [i]...and purchased membership.[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:21am Matriculated: [i] few months later, as part of his ongoing campaign against Kent, Thompson followed links to gay porn on Kent's website[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:40am sortableturnip: Jack's at it again: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2008/07/jack_thompson_faces_permanent.php
Hey actually Paul has the best ideas for helping people caught in a bad situation.
Paul advocates re-focusing our national defenses on protecting our borders and not corportate-welfarism-Empire-building. In that respect, I feel he supports the troops and strengthening our national security more than any other candidate.
The money saved from slowing down our British-Empire-dopplegangerism would make things like Social Security and Medicaid solvent again.
Paul has said often that though he would prefer to improve the economy in ways that help less people be dependent on government aid, those programs are the absolute last on his list of programs he's uncomfortable with. This is the polar opposite of warmongers like Bush who need trillions for world conquest and collateral damage but can't spare some change for programs like S-Chip.
Finally, all this crap about Paul being a closet racist is simply crap. It's the McCain's-black-baby whisper campaign of 2008. (McCain and his wife had adopted a baby from overseas whom they loved and took good care of and Bush operatives turned it into a very effective anti-McCain lie amongst the closet racists in SC in 2004) It has been disproven again and again. The NYT ran an official retraction two days ago saying everything they checked out proved that these are decades old slanders. What is clear is that Paul is perhaps the least racist candidate running. Other than Obama who has been really impressive about not biting when haters pull the race card, I've been most impressed with Paul. Paul doesn't pull the anti-Arab card, the anti-Jew card, the white supremacist crap, or even the hispanics-are-watering-down-our-culture crap when he gets all hardline about illegal immigration. If you listen to the man himself - and not a couple fringe wackos who think they agree with him - you're likely to be impressed at that.
Anyways, I'm also surprised at the lack of Paul defense on this site. Maybe he is simply under-represented amongst gamers. That's cool with me. As much as I like the guy, I'm not sure I'd want a bunch of spam chat about politics on my server neither. But if they're cool about the 1 morning thing maybe it'll be not-so-big-a-deal. (Seems most guilds are more active at night).
My 2 cents. And nah I don't really care whether they're backed by gold or not . . . I haven't studied that issue enough. Mostly I like Paul 'cuz he's into freedom, against collateral damage and sending our 'bravest and best' into questionable enagements, backs up his craziest ideas with really interesting arguments (like the whole gold standard stuff), and just seems genuine - which is way refreshing to me. Plus he's been in Congress for 20 years and seems the best read of any of the guys (or gals) on our actual founding principles.