Where Politics And Video Games Collide

"I am hopeful that the 9th Circuit will overturn the lower courts decision and help empower parents with the ultimate decision over whether or not their children play in a world of violence and murder."

Parents already have the power to make that choice, Mr. Yee. You're taking away those parents' power to MAKE IT.

"It defies logic to suggest that our founding fathers intended to adopt a First Amendment that would guarantee children the right to purchase a video game wherein the player is rewarded for interactively causing the character to take out a shovel and bash the head of an image of a human being"

Maybe because, nine times out of ten, it ISN'T seen as a reward in the game?

"Or guarantee children the right to purchase a video game where the player can cause the character to wound an image of a human being with a rifle by shooting out a kneecap, pour gasoline on the wounded character"

...are you just making these up as you go along for the shock value, Mr. Yee?

"Instead, the proper, more reasoned approach to First Amendment jurisprudence recognizes that the rights of minors are not coextensive with those of adults. States must be allowed to legislate to protect the health and welfare of children with certain universally recognized differences between adults and children in mind."

In other words, you're saying that parents have NO free will, and that the government knows people's children better than the parents do.

Riiiiiight.

Mr. Yee, come back when you're not insulting every parent not only in the state of California, but in the entire country. Maybe then you'll actually sound unbiased.