Submitted by Father Time - January 10, 2008 at 4:16 pm -050075.82.2.247
kids should be able to form their opinion on the basis on uncensored speech (as stated by judge Posner in the first court win for video games). Now put in proper context, those acts of violence can EASILY fall under protected speech, political speech even.
"It defies logic to suggest that our founding fathers intended to adopt a First Amendment that would guarantee children the right to purchase a video game"
The concept of a video game in general (hell probably a TV even) would be completely alien to them so of course they didn't consider them. Now the founding fathers do not determine what is and is not free speech they were never judges (to my knowledge) and they are all dead. We can only conclude that the founding fathers might not approved only because this type of violence would have shocked them, as does a lot of stuff we do today. But even then it's still ignorant to assume you would know the exact opinion of the founding fathers when they never had to deal with the whole issue of 'does violent media = speech'. The fact is though that video games can easily be free speech just as any story with any type of theme is.
Oh and second off, why should the right of free speech to minors be more restricted than that of adults? I'd like to see an answer to that.
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:04pm Freyar: I demand to see this letter! (Not that I have any grounds to demand on.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:53pm gamepolitics: JT called me a "sock puppet" in an e-mail to Hal Halpin... i gave him 24 hours to retract it, LOL
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:46pm Haggard: Might want to take a look at what Anthony Horowitz wrote about GTA IV in the Telegraph, article seems to have been taken down
Posted 07/23/08 at 01:05pm Silencets: Beutiful. I always did wonder about Jacko Wacko
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:24am Matriculated: So Jack (an anti-gay activist) PAYED for gay porn
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:22am Matriculated: [i]...and purchased membership.[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:21am Matriculated: [i] few months later, as part of his ongoing campaign against Kent, Thompson followed links to gay porn on Kent's website[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:40am sortableturnip: Jack's at it again: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2008/07/jack_thompson_faces_permanent.php
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:22pm PHOENIXZERO: Ugh, that CNBC program "Play to Win" is it? Is on again...
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:34pm ZippyDSM: todayin zippy land:after spending 8 hours working on my AC unit yesterday it finally died today. theres go 300$ I don't have...tin trailers are ovens in the summer >>
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:17pm Cheater87: http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/news/132121.20080723.Saints-Row-2-uncensored-in-Australia/
"It defies logic to suggest that our founding fathers intended to adopt a First Amendment that would guarantee children the right to purchase a video game"
The concept of a video game in general (hell probably a TV even) would be completely alien to them so of course they didn't consider them. Now the founding fathers do not determine what is and is not free speech they were never judges (to my knowledge) and they are all dead. We can only conclude that the founding fathers might not approved only because this type of violence would have shocked them, as does a lot of stuff we do today. But even then it's still ignorant to assume you would know the exact opinion of the founding fathers when they never had to deal with the whole issue of 'does violent media = speech'. The fact is though that video games can easily be free speech just as any story with any type of theme is.
Oh and second off, why should the right of free speech to minors be more restricted than that of adults? I'd like to see an answer to that.