First, when are these people going to realize that most (male) kids 12 and up already know about violence, already think it's "cool" and/or "fun" to play violent video games, and yet are perfectly normal 12 year olds. It's not like Humans are born without any innate knowledge of survival in them. That instinct for survival can sometimes mean violence. But they know when and when not to use it. Well, if their parents help them out, which parents don't seem to be doing these days according to PTC and others. What 5 year old hasn't already had two toy cars and "wrecked" them, sound effects and all?

Second, The whole Video Game Industry is not responsible for marketing. It's mostly the retailers, then last on the line on the way to the consumer. I'd say it's more the clueless parents who buy it for their kids and then go, "oh, wow I didn't know this was so violent! I was tricked!" Do some research! Being inept with technology is not an excuse to be inept at being a parent. It's not like your job as a parent doesn't include other responsibilities, say like learning and keeping up with the times.

Third, how did the video game industry, "subject millions of children to sexually graphic material" when it was a hack that only a few hundred probably did. And a bad hack at that. And come on, have these people really even seen that scene? It's a joke!

Fourth, and final point:

Video games imitate real life. There's violence in real life, so GTA:SA mimics it, and PARODIES it. It's not the other way around. While I can't say it's impossible that a VG has influences someones violent decision, it's the exception, not the norm. Which is more likely to make you lash back: A person punching you in real life, or a video game avatar punching you on your "Wii"? Which is more likely to train you to fight back: Pressing a button repeatedly on your console, or training with a punching bag?

The whole game, and most others are poking fun at how our world works. It's a break from the real world, where you think, "Why do people do this?" In Video Game land, you go "This is so ridiculous!" That's the whole point.

People take that game (and many more) way too seriously, when it is taking real life to it's logical extremes, which don't make any sense. And it's all for entertainment! It's the same reason you go to the movies, to see stuff that's extreme, that you couldn't do in real life. That doesn't mean that everyone wants to do it in real life.

Ugh, somewhere in there I had a point.

Reply

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/24/08 at 01:45pm
Dark Sovereign: A fitting metaphor lumi
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:21am
lumi: their own. Looks like they're arguing with ghosts...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am
lumi: Ooh, and to prove the validity of their arguments, they've deleted all the comments from the gamers/outsiders, and just left
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am
lumi: Wow...there's worse invective and vitriol on that first feminist site's comments than in most gaming forums I've read...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:19am
SimonBob: You guys can read the feminist blogs? One of 'em has over 1400 comments -- my browser locks up when I try to load the page!
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:49am
M. Carusi: That's probably the message to describe hardcore feminism in general. :P
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:35am
Tom90deg: Meh, it seems like most of the comments are "I'm right, and it you don't agree with me, you're a girl-hating masonogystic pig!"
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:30am
M. Carusi: Those comment walls on the feminist blogs complaining about FP are generating some hilarious content.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am
E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am
sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am
sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm
LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm
gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm
GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm
Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm
Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Login or register to post shouts