Submitted by GoodRobotUs - February 7, 2008 at 8:18 pm -050079.66.241.43
I suppose the thing I will say about the UK system is that it does not discriminate any particular form of media and are actually pretty forgiving when compared to the ESRB with some forms of content, they realise that it's not difficult for children to figure out that women have breasts, for example, whereas I think it's only a matter of time before the US starts promoting anti-breastfeeding campaigns because it means exposing children to sexually related images which could turn them into sex-offenders, after all, nearly 70% of all sex offenders were breast-fed, so it must be true... (That would be funny, were it not an exact replica of how a censors mind works).
Should it be a legal requirement? Well, I think as long as it is applied across the board, it is not discriminating, it should, in theory, mean that the same bar is set across the board, and, if the Byron review does recommend balancing out all the media systems, would actually mean we could do away with stupid comments like 'possibility of harm' that the BBFC used regarding Manhunt 2, because they wouldn't be able to make the claim that some versions would inevitably fall into kids hands nearly so easily.
What is really needed in the UK is to get out of the grey, voluntary or not, the system needs to work, and at the moment, it isn't properly, for a great deal of reasons, street trading, Internet downloads and lack of monitoring are among the many culprits.
Some of those fall firmly on the parents shoulders, a parent still has to take responsibility for their child, raising awareness of that is probably enough of a job, so it won't be a short haul, but to be honest, the government want to fiddle around with the BBFC as little as possible, and equally, the BBFC tend to resist government interference quite emphatically, regardless of rumour.
I suppose in summary, whether the system is a law-based or an industry-fine based one, it has to work and be effective whilst also being unbiased, otherwise it is pointless, and it's that which needs to be focussed on in the UK.
Posted 07/06/08 at 06:57pm Silencets: I bet the Floida Supreme Court is just shaking in fear of JT
Posted 07/06/08 at 06:55pm Silencets: JT is always on the right track. Look how many cases he's won!
Posted 07/06/08 at 01:57pm BlackIce: It might be just a bit too late now.
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:07pm Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: Jack, Jack, Jack... When will you learn?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:38am tallimar: hmm... youre right, im not getting the right mind frame... "YOU WILL LIKE FRIES WITH THAT!" how's that?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:36am gameman9: Nah, he will just scare the customers.
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:35am tallimar: i think jack's new line may end up being "would you like fries with that?"
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:00am Adamas Draconis: His fave line. Always thought it should be "They've got me right where I want them."
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:43am gamepolitics: he's got 'em right where he wants 'em,LOL
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:30am Silencets: It was a great idea. Just another step in the overarcing master plan off JT...we little people wouldn't understand....
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:35am Jack Wessels: Yeah I knew that part. I'm just amazed at whatever thought process led him to think that was a good idea.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:33am gamepolitics: actually, he also sent similar material to the FL Supreme Court about 6 months before that
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:24am Jack Wessels: for him and would somehow get Kent in trouble.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:23am Jack Wessels: @GP: Wow, I've skimmed that one before, but I never noticed that JT actually thought this was good news....
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Should it be a legal requirement? Well, I think as long as it is applied across the board, it is not discriminating, it should, in theory, mean that the same bar is set across the board, and, if the Byron review does recommend balancing out all the media systems, would actually mean we could do away with stupid comments like 'possibility of harm' that the BBFC used regarding Manhunt 2, because they wouldn't be able to make the claim that some versions would inevitably fall into kids hands nearly so easily.
What is really needed in the UK is to get out of the grey, voluntary or not, the system needs to work, and at the moment, it isn't properly, for a great deal of reasons, street trading, Internet downloads and lack of monitoring are among the many culprits.
Some of those fall firmly on the parents shoulders, a parent still has to take responsibility for their child, raising awareness of that is probably enough of a job, so it won't be a short haul, but to be honest, the government want to fiddle around with the BBFC as little as possible, and equally, the BBFC tend to resist government interference quite emphatically, regardless of rumour.
I suppose in summary, whether the system is a law-based or an industry-fine based one, it has to work and be effective whilst also being unbiased, otherwise it is pointless, and it's that which needs to be focussed on in the UK.