Submitted by Setesh - February 12, 2008 at 10:16 am -0500207.148.157.228
It's the same as the record industry, people who pirate games aren't people who are big consumers in the first place, most of them are either trying to make a point, or simply don't have the money in the first place. They see this huge market they think they can somehow capture, but they don't understand that these people will never be regular music buying software purchasing people.
DRM, IP, and all that other crap is nothing but an attempt at oppression, as far as I'm concerned, the more laws that circumvent corporate control, the better. They already have consumers by the balls in nearly everything else. Here is some food for thought, say I don't agree with my cell phone providers contract, and I want something different, there is no negotiation, I accept, or they show me the door, shouldn't the cell phone company be trying meet MY requirements? Except it's hard for consumers to coordinate as a whole, but easy for a company to unilaterally dictate it's terms to consumers. I'm not a bad driver, yet, because of my sex and age, I pay high insurance, shouldn't I dictate MY terms to the insurance company, and if I prove myself dangerous or unreliable, then appropriate actions can be taken, no, instead they discriminate based on my sex and age, because they can, because consumers let them. Large corporates make CONSUMERS take the risk away, I say, screw 'em. I support any laws taking power away from them. You want to make money? Make your product so appealing you CAN'T lose money, instead of trying to coerce people into agreement of their terms of use.
Posted 07/06/08 at 06:57pm Silencets: I bet the Floida Supreme Court is just shaking in fear of JT
Posted 07/06/08 at 06:55pm Silencets: JT is always on the right track. Look how many cases he's won!
Posted 07/06/08 at 01:57pm BlackIce: It might be just a bit too late now.
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:07pm Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: Jack, Jack, Jack... When will you learn?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:38am tallimar: hmm... youre right, im not getting the right mind frame... "YOU WILL LIKE FRIES WITH THAT!" how's that?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:36am gameman9: Nah, he will just scare the customers.
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:35am tallimar: i think jack's new line may end up being "would you like fries with that?"
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:00am Adamas Draconis: His fave line. Always thought it should be "They've got me right where I want them."
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:43am gamepolitics: he's got 'em right where he wants 'em,LOL
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:30am Silencets: It was a great idea. Just another step in the overarcing master plan off JT...we little people wouldn't understand....
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:35am Jack Wessels: Yeah I knew that part. I'm just amazed at whatever thought process led him to think that was a good idea.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:33am gamepolitics: actually, he also sent similar material to the FL Supreme Court about 6 months before that
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:24am Jack Wessels: for him and would somehow get Kent in trouble.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:23am Jack Wessels: @GP: Wow, I've skimmed that one before, but I never noticed that JT actually thought this was good news....
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
DRM, IP, and all that other crap is nothing but an attempt at oppression, as far as I'm concerned, the more laws that circumvent corporate control, the better. They already have consumers by the balls in nearly everything else. Here is some food for thought, say I don't agree with my cell phone providers contract, and I want something different, there is no negotiation, I accept, or they show me the door, shouldn't the cell phone company be trying meet MY requirements? Except it's hard for consumers to coordinate as a whole, but easy for a company to unilaterally dictate it's terms to consumers. I'm not a bad driver, yet, because of my sex and age, I pay high insurance, shouldn't I dictate MY terms to the insurance company, and if I prove myself dangerous or unreliable, then appropriate actions can be taken, no, instead they discriminate based on my sex and age, because they can, because consumers let them. Large corporates make CONSUMERS take the risk away, I say, screw 'em. I support any laws taking power away from them. You want to make money? Make your product so appealing you CAN'T lose money, instead of trying to coerce people into agreement of their terms of use.