Submitted by Scottland89 - February 18, 2008 at 1:00 pm -050082.23.117.114
@Tony
Well look at it this way, if they do it the call people way, thats another 750,000 calls to check on fraud, out of how many, say a million a year they already have? And lets be honest, if we take 750,000 out of those million, they are more important. I mean a wow subscriptions is about £110 a year roughly, if they pay monthly, while the other cases are going to be worth what, £500+? What would you rather lose? £110 or £500+?
If you worked in a call centre, who would you rahter deal with? 750,000 angry gamers about their wow subscription, or somebody who are trying to buy more important things?
To me, it makes sense, and glad that that I'm not going to pay for some guys lvl 32 rouge, without my permission, which I will not give.
I work in a shop, and I do something that may be considered a bit of inconveniance, which is make people check the amount I've put in for any card transaction, when most other people don't do this, so someone is not paying £329.90 on something costing £32.99.
Posted 07/24/08 at 01:45pm Dark Sovereign: A fitting metaphor lumi
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:21am lumi: their own. Looks like they're arguing with ghosts...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am lumi: Ooh, and to prove the validity of their arguments, they've deleted all the comments from the gamers/outsiders, and just left
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am lumi: Wow...there's worse invective and vitriol on that first feminist site's comments than in most gaming forums I've read...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:19am SimonBob: You guys can read the feminist blogs? One of 'em has over 1400 comments -- my browser locks up when I try to load the page!
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:49am M. Carusi: That's probably the message to describe hardcore feminism in general. :P
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:35am Tom90deg: Meh, it seems like most of the comments are "I'm right, and it you don't agree with me, you're a girl-hating masonogystic pig!"
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:30am M. Carusi: Those comment walls on the feminist blogs complaining about FP are generating some hilarious content.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Well look at it this way, if they do it the call people way, thats another 750,000 calls to check on fraud, out of how many, say a million a year they already have? And lets be honest, if we take 750,000 out of those million, they are more important. I mean a wow subscriptions is about £110 a year roughly, if they pay monthly, while the other cases are going to be worth what, £500+? What would you rather lose? £110 or £500+?
If you worked in a call centre, who would you rahter deal with? 750,000 angry gamers about their wow subscription, or somebody who are trying to buy more important things?
To me, it makes sense, and glad that that I'm not going to pay for some guys lvl 32 rouge, without my permission, which I will not give.
I work in a shop, and I do something that may be considered a bit of inconveniance, which is make people check the amount I've put in for any card transaction, when most other people don't do this, so someone is not paying £329.90 on something costing £32.99.