Submitted by E. Zachary Knight - March 3, 2008 at 10:32 am -0500137.240.136.86
Having only read the hilights posted here, I must say, the ESA is on very shaky ground with me.
First off, you cannot truly messure piracy. Yes it is happening. Yes PC gaming is suffering from it. But there probably not as much as they say there is. For one, only a very minority portion of the game playing public pirates. The average people are not tech savvy enough or not willing to take the time to pirate. Why search for a decent crack when the real coppy is only a twenty minute drive away?
Next, the Mass Effect thing is just plain wrong. They should have said something. They knew that the media was sensationalizing it. They could have public decried Fox News. But I think that the ESA was probably more worried about losing Fox's support rather than protectin gthe image of the gmae industry. They say that they pick and choose their battles when it involves one game, but they shouldn't. They represent all game publishers and developers. By proxy they represent all games. They should be willing to fight for all games. At least ones that are affiliated with them.
To say that the gamers did a bang up job so we didn't have to do anything, is stupid. Are you going to rely on the gamers from now on? I hope not. Gamers are very unpredictable as shown by the Fox News crap. But you are a structured organization and should be using that yto your advantage.
I want to believe that the ESA has the best interest of the publishers and developers at heart, but everytime I read something about them or from them, they sound more like the RIAA than anything.
Posted 07/24/08 at 01:45pm Dark Sovereign: A fitting metaphor lumi
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:21am lumi: their own. Looks like they're arguing with ghosts...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am lumi: Ooh, and to prove the validity of their arguments, they've deleted all the comments from the gamers/outsiders, and just left
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am lumi: Wow...there's worse invective and vitriol on that first feminist site's comments than in most gaming forums I've read...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:19am SimonBob: You guys can read the feminist blogs? One of 'em has over 1400 comments -- my browser locks up when I try to load the page!
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:49am M. Carusi: That's probably the message to describe hardcore feminism in general. :P
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:35am Tom90deg: Meh, it seems like most of the comments are "I'm right, and it you don't agree with me, you're a girl-hating masonogystic pig!"
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:30am M. Carusi: Those comment walls on the feminist blogs complaining about FP are generating some hilarious content.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
First off, you cannot truly messure piracy. Yes it is happening. Yes PC gaming is suffering from it. But there probably not as much as they say there is. For one, only a very minority portion of the game playing public pirates. The average people are not tech savvy enough or not willing to take the time to pirate. Why search for a decent crack when the real coppy is only a twenty minute drive away?
Next, the Mass Effect thing is just plain wrong. They should have said something. They knew that the media was sensationalizing it. They could have public decried Fox News. But I think that the ESA was probably more worried about losing Fox's support rather than protectin gthe image of the gmae industry. They say that they pick and choose their battles when it involves one game, but they shouldn't. They represent all game publishers and developers. By proxy they represent all games. They should be willing to fight for all games. At least ones that are affiliated with them.
To say that the gamers did a bang up job so we didn't have to do anything, is stupid. Are you going to rely on the gamers from now on? I hope not. Gamers are very unpredictable as shown by the Fox News crap. But you are a structured organization and should be using that yto your advantage.
I want to believe that the ESA has the best interest of the publishers and developers at heart, but everytime I read something about them or from them, they sound more like the RIAA than anything.