Submitted by lumi - March 11, 2008 at 1:11 pm -0500212.23.44.107
@ jkdjr25
"He has the right to protest against the exibit and he has every right to call for the showing’s cancelation. Everyone needs to calm down about this and stop lobbing insults at the man."
Are you sure you read everything the man said? Nothing blatantly hypocritical and contradictory jumps out at you?
He has the right to protest this piece. I think it's a stupid opinion, but he has a right to express it. Wanting it gone from RPI makes him... yeah, whatever. But then chasing it to the Sanctuary, and protesting there, too? What possible explanation is there for that other than wanting to completely censor the exhibit? "Not only are you not allowed to do it on school grounds, I don't want you to do it ANYWHERE."
And all this without examining his actual words, which pretty much prove our point for us. I may not dispute his right to express his opinion, but I fervently hold that his opinion and actions make him a craven asshole who should be ignored utterly.
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:04pm Freyar: I demand to see this letter! (Not that I have any grounds to demand on.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:53pm gamepolitics: JT called me a "sock puppet" in an e-mail to Hal Halpin... i gave him 24 hours to retract it, LOL
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:46pm Haggard: Might want to take a look at what Anthony Horowitz wrote about GTA IV in the Telegraph, article seems to have been taken down
Posted 07/23/08 at 01:05pm Silencets: Beutiful. I always did wonder about Jacko Wacko
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:24am Matriculated: So Jack (an anti-gay activist) PAYED for gay porn
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:22am Matriculated: [i]...and purchased membership.[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:21am Matriculated: [i] few months later, as part of his ongoing campaign against Kent, Thompson followed links to gay porn on Kent's website[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:40am sortableturnip: Jack's at it again: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2008/07/jack_thompson_faces_permanent.php
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:22pm PHOENIXZERO: Ugh, that CNBC program "Play to Win" is it? Is on again...
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:34pm ZippyDSM: todayin zippy land:after spending 8 hours working on my AC unit yesterday it finally died today. theres go 300$ I don't have...tin trailers are ovens in the summer >>
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:17pm Cheater87: http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/news/132121.20080723.Saints-Row-2-uncensored-in-Australia/
"He has the right to protest against the exibit and he has every right to call for the showing’s cancelation. Everyone needs to calm down about this and stop lobbing insults at the man."
Are you sure you read everything the man said? Nothing blatantly hypocritical and contradictory jumps out at you?
He has the right to protest this piece. I think it's a stupid opinion, but he has a right to express it. Wanting it gone from RPI makes him... yeah, whatever. But then chasing it to the Sanctuary, and protesting there, too? What possible explanation is there for that other than wanting to completely censor the exhibit? "Not only are you not allowed to do it on school grounds, I don't want you to do it ANYWHERE."
And all this without examining his actual words, which pretty much prove our point for us. I may not dispute his right to express his opinion, but I fervently hold that his opinion and actions make him a craven asshole who should be ignored utterly.