Submitted by shady8x - March 11, 2008 at 7:26 pm -0500128.138.24.154
@Bob
"They are absolutely right that the university doesn’t have to show this exhibit, or any exhibit. However, they were willing to do so until these narrow minded people got involved.
Therefore its not a case of the Universities right to show or not show an exhibit of any subject, they HAD CHOSEN to show it. Its now become censorship and thats shocking in such a setting."
It is their choice to show or not show it. How is it censorship if the same people that decided to show it, have now decided to not show it???
You are being ridiculous...
Those people that got vocal didn't censor it, the university did, as is its right...it was worried about its money flow and they protected the university as they were supposed to...
By you logic: If I want to host a poetry reading in my house but then say I don't want you to use my house go to the house next door, HOW THE HELL IS THAT CENSORSHIP???? If its my house I have the right to do what I want. The next thing you are gonna tell me is that unless that reading is being held at every house, all those house owners are censoring that poetry... That is your logic here and it isn't very logical...
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:22pm PHOENIXZERO: Ugh, that CNBC program "Play to Win" is it? Is on again...
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:34pm ZippyDSM: todayin zippy land:after spending 8 hours working on my AC unit yesterday it finally died today. theres go 300$ I don't have...tin trailers are ovens in the summer >>
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:17pm Cheater87: http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/news/132121.20080723.Saints-Row-2-uncensored-in-Australia/
Posted 07/22/08 at 08:37pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Never had a Dreamcast. My first actual console was a Playstation.
Posted 07/22/08 at 05:43pm HarmlessBunny: My Dreamcast still has Soul Calibur in it...that used to be addictive *shivers* Must feed addiction....
Posted 07/22/08 at 05:11pm Austin_Lewis: My dreamcast is hooked up with Shenmue in it, but it hasn't been played in a long while.
Posted 07/22/08 at 04:45pm KayleL: My dreamcast is still hooked up to the TV, but since I was young when I got it, most discs are badly scratched
Posted 07/22/08 at 02:34pm SimonBob: Technically, you still got money for hit-n-runs, same as the modern GTAs. But you didn't have to leave the car to pick it up.
Posted 07/22/08 at 01:07pm GryphonOsiris: Dreamcast, man, now there is a blast from the past.
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:41am gamepolitics: i think the last one of those I played was on the Dreamcast...
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:17am gamepolitics: smiley, it's been so long since I've played those top-down versions. I'll take your word for it
Posted 07/22/08 at 10:26am M. Carusi: So is anyone writing to Governor Paterson about the law? I may be from CT but I'm going to. It's better than nothing.
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:11am Alteffor: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/07/17/2306153.htm
Posted 07/22/08 at 07:14am Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : @Smiley: Told you.
Posted 07/22/08 at 07:06am gamepolitics: Hey, Lunatic (& everyone else) please don't be soliciting or posting anyone's personal info, incl. e-mail addresses. Thx
Posted 07/22/08 at 06:49am Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : @Smiley: Uhh... I'm gonna assume you don't know about the Comments Section of each article and point it out to you
Posted 07/22/08 at 06:47am Smiley: Nah, just commenting on the article... GTA1 and GTA2 both give you points for killing people so the point isn't entirely right..
Posted 07/22/08 at 06:43am Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : @Smiley: Uhh... Are you talking to me?
Posted 07/22/08 at 06:35am Smiley: Hang on... GP wrote that the GTA series has "no such points" Have you not played GTA1 or GTA2?
Posted 07/22/08 at 05:35am Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : I happen to know it, but if I entered that particular bit of info, I could get banned.
"They are absolutely right that the university doesn’t have to show this exhibit, or any exhibit. However, they were willing to do so until these narrow minded people got involved.
Therefore its not a case of the Universities right to show or not show an exhibit of any subject, they HAD CHOSEN to show it. Its now become censorship and thats shocking in such a setting."
It is their choice to show or not show it. How is it censorship if the same people that decided to show it, have now decided to not show it???
You are being ridiculous...
Those people that got vocal didn't censor it, the university did, as is its right...it was worried about its money flow and they protected the university as they were supposed to...
By you logic: If I want to host a poetry reading in my house but then say I don't want you to use my house go to the house next door, HOW THE HELL IS THAT CENSORSHIP???? If its my house I have the right to do what I want. The next thing you are gonna tell me is that unless that reading is being held at every house, all those house owners are censoring that poetry... That is your logic here and it isn't very logical...