Submitted by hcf - April 4, 2008 at 4:46 pm -0500204.152.187.144
That was very brief of me and not very informative; Because the network signs an SLA (Service Level Agreement) that requires some level of performance (often referred to as Quality of Service or QoS), that means they need to configure the network to enforce that level of performance to conform with that SLA.

So the network (usually through MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) configuration) has to start dropping packets relating to SLAs that are "better than conforming" in order to keep other SLAs from "not conforming."

Does that make better sense?

Traffic engineering is not traffic censuring; Net Neutrality can potentially do something about traffic censuring, but not about traffic engineering. This also explains why Comcast is so keen to redefine their censures as traffic engineering: if they can convince people they're just trying to enforce SLAs (which usually have some monetary punitive damage for non-conformance), then there really isn't any basis to complain.

Reply

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am
infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm
eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm
Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm
Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm
Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Posted 07/05/08 at 03:27pm
Silencets: I'm sure JT had a perfectly good reason sending gay porn....It'll come to me any day now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:54pm
Grendal: once you send gay porn to judges, I'm comfortable calling you crazy
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:46pm
eraserheadthelynch: I dont think hes crazy but his values and social skills are slightly wrack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:38pm
Grendal: Jacks actually a really good example of how not to deal with your mental illness and what can happen if it goes untreated
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:37pm
Grendal: Well most people with a mental illness admit it and get help instead of trolling a website for their ego ala jack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:32pm
BlackIce: True, that does explain why the Patriot Act is legal, but..
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:21pm
Grendal: As far as I know theres no law banning people with mental illness from holding jobs as lawyers or judges
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:40pm
BlackIce: Sadly, the law banning Mentals from any sort of important job isn't well enforced. Therefore, Jackie is still a "Lawyer".
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:23pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack Thompson is drooling right now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:23pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: "Two teens were apparently arguing over a Sony PSP in Jacksonville, Florida ended in a shooting".
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:22pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Have you checked this? http://kotaku.com/5022241/psp-at-the-center-of-florida-shooting
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:30am
gameman9: I though Jack Thompson was banned.
Posted 07/05/08 at 08:30am
sqlrob: metal is right. That metal just happens to be mercuryt
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:58am
eraserheadthelynch: mental
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:57am
eraserheadthelynch: but hes still a metal case
Login or register to post shouts