Submitted by KillianD - April 8, 2008 at 7:03 pm -0500155.68.115.78
@Ebonheart
I hate that saying...Ignorance is not bliss. Lack of responsibility is relaxing, that's all. And that only holds up until whoever is responsible for you makes a decision you don't like. Anyway.
It's been said already, but I concur that not warning children in some fashion is the true irresponsibility. You can't "protect" them by not telling them anything. You will not always be there to tell them what to do, and even if you were, they might not do it. And if they did...then they're not really living, are they? Life without choice is empty. Risk is part of every choice. And knowledge is the only thing that helps people avoid risks, whether they are young or old. Therefore, knowledge is a necessity.
Now, I don't think we should necessarily start warning kids about the potential dangers of substance abuse/etc. as soon as they can walk...but when they're 15, they better know. Because when I was in high school (not long ago, I'm in college now) over 50% of my grade could already be categorized by their substance of choice (alcohol. cigarettes, and pot being the big three, with ecstasy and coke belonging to a minority) at the beginning of freshman year. To reiterate: they already had these habits, possibly addictions, known to each other and myself when high school started. Kids can learn earlier than adults think.
Oh, and to put that in context: the school was a private high school in the northeastern united states. I think that's enough to get the idea. This happens, and in plenty of places. Parents need to stop lying to themselves about the innocence of children.
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:04pm Freyar: I demand to see this letter! (Not that I have any grounds to demand on.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:53pm gamepolitics: JT called me a "sock puppet" in an e-mail to Hal Halpin... i gave him 24 hours to retract it, LOL
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:46pm Haggard: Might want to take a look at what Anthony Horowitz wrote about GTA IV in the Telegraph, article seems to have been taken down
Posted 07/23/08 at 01:05pm Silencets: Beutiful. I always did wonder about Jacko Wacko
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:24am Matriculated: So Jack (an anti-gay activist) PAYED for gay porn
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:22am Matriculated: [i]...and purchased membership.[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:21am Matriculated: [i] few months later, as part of his ongoing campaign against Kent, Thompson followed links to gay porn on Kent's website[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:40am sortableturnip: Jack's at it again: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2008/07/jack_thompson_faces_permanent.php
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:22pm PHOENIXZERO: Ugh, that CNBC program "Play to Win" is it? Is on again...
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:34pm ZippyDSM: todayin zippy land:after spending 8 hours working on my AC unit yesterday it finally died today. theres go 300$ I don't have...tin trailers are ovens in the summer >>
Posted 07/22/08 at 09:17pm Cheater87: http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/news/132121.20080723.Saints-Row-2-uncensored-in-Australia/
I hate that saying...Ignorance is not bliss. Lack of responsibility is relaxing, that's all. And that only holds up until whoever is responsible for you makes a decision you don't like. Anyway.
It's been said already, but I concur that not warning children in some fashion is the true irresponsibility. You can't "protect" them by not telling them anything. You will not always be there to tell them what to do, and even if you were, they might not do it. And if they did...then they're not really living, are they? Life without choice is empty. Risk is part of every choice. And knowledge is the only thing that helps people avoid risks, whether they are young or old. Therefore, knowledge is a necessity.
Now, I don't think we should necessarily start warning kids about the potential dangers of substance abuse/etc. as soon as they can walk...but when they're 15, they better know. Because when I was in high school (not long ago, I'm in college now) over 50% of my grade could already be categorized by their substance of choice (alcohol. cigarettes, and pot being the big three, with ecstasy and coke belonging to a minority) at the beginning of freshman year. To reiterate: they already had these habits, possibly addictions, known to each other and myself when high school started. Kids can learn earlier than adults think.
Oh, and to put that in context: the school was a private high school in the northeastern united states. I think that's enough to get the idea. This happens, and in plenty of places. Parents need to stop lying to themselves about the innocence of children.