Submitted by Federico - May 1, 2008 at 12:53 pm -0500189.153.46.124
...Well, I don't know if this has been said before, but what about the artistic value of the game?
Yeah, many people would argue that this "violence-promoting" game would barely be considered an art at all, when really, it would be just like asking:
"Why would anyone want to watch The Sopranos? It's all violence, and doesnt even have any film or artistic value!"
That's something you would defend, right?
Seriously, if you think all people think the same way, you have yet to earn your medical degree, Mr. Robertson.
And it goes way beyond "Because it's an entertaining game."
People's mentalities can go far and wide.
Some play it for the hype, others, because they want to have a "naughty boy" moment in their perfectly balanced family and religion based life.
Maybe because this would not compare to anything people see in the news nowadays.
Many points can be made against his claims and thoughts. Some to defend the game, some to defend any other thing that is read between the lines.
...And am I the only one to think he looks like an older Rick Astley in that picture?
Posted 07/24/08 at 01:45pm Dark Sovereign: A fitting metaphor lumi
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:21am lumi: their own. Looks like they're arguing with ghosts...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am lumi: Ooh, and to prove the validity of their arguments, they've deleted all the comments from the gamers/outsiders, and just left
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am lumi: Wow...there's worse invective and vitriol on that first feminist site's comments than in most gaming forums I've read...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:19am SimonBob: You guys can read the feminist blogs? One of 'em has over 1400 comments -- my browser locks up when I try to load the page!
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:49am M. Carusi: That's probably the message to describe hardcore feminism in general. :P
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:35am Tom90deg: Meh, it seems like most of the comments are "I'm right, and it you don't agree with me, you're a girl-hating masonogystic pig!"
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:30am M. Carusi: Those comment walls on the feminist blogs complaining about FP are generating some hilarious content.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Yeah, many people would argue that this "violence-promoting" game would barely be considered an art at all, when really, it would be just like asking:
"Why would anyone want to watch The Sopranos? It's all violence, and doesnt even have any film or artistic value!"
That's something you would defend, right?
Seriously, if you think all people think the same way, you have yet to earn your medical degree, Mr. Robertson.
And it goes way beyond "Because it's an entertaining game."
People's mentalities can go far and wide.
Some play it for the hype, others, because they want to have a "naughty boy" moment in their perfectly balanced family and religion based life.
Maybe because this would not compare to anything people see in the news nowadays.
Many points can be made against his claims and thoughts. Some to defend the game, some to defend any other thing that is read between the lines.
...And am I the only one to think he looks like an older Rick Astley in that picture?