Submitted by lumi - May 2, 2008 at 9:18 am -0500212.23.44.107
Chalts, the controversy over the school was that they accepted his work knowing full well what it was about (in fact, they invited him), and then decided to cancel it after the Young Republicans started accusing the school of “fostering terrorism”. Then tried to blow it off, all the while pretending they are all for fostering academic and artistic freedom.
The school administration’s complete about-turn in the face of moral panic is what irks most people.
Exactly.
I was just up there last weekend for a function at RPI, I'm annoyed with myself for failing to look into how this was playing out.
@ tony selby they arn’t actually suing over the incident at the school, as you stated, they really didn’t do anything illegal, their finacial backers complained threated to pull funding so they folded, sucks for the exhibit but nothing really wrong there
See above. They didn't do anything illegal, technically, but it was definitely wrong. They had no "moral outrage" or "discomfort with the exhibit" when they invited him, KNOWING the content of said exhibit. They canceled after the fact, after the Young Republicans club saw the exhibit and started in with their demented bleating about RPI being a "terrorist haven".
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Posted 07/05/08 at 03:27pm Silencets: I'm sure JT had a perfectly good reason sending gay porn....It'll come to me any day now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:54pm Grendal: once you send gay porn to judges, I'm comfortable calling you crazy
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:46pm eraserheadthelynch: I dont think hes crazy but his values and social skills are slightly wrack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:38pm Grendal: Jacks actually a really good example of how not to deal with your mental illness and what can happen if it goes untreated
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:37pm Grendal: Well most people with a mental illness admit it and get help instead of trolling a website for their ego ala jack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:32pm BlackIce: True, that does explain why the Patriot Act is legal, but..
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:21pm Grendal: As far as I know theres no law banning people with mental illness from holding jobs as lawyers or judges
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:40pm BlackIce: Sadly, the law banning Mentals from any sort of important job isn't well enforced. Therefore, Jackie is still a "Lawyer".
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:23pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack Thompson is drooling right now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:23pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: "Two teens were apparently arguing over a Sony PSP in Jacksonville, Florida ended in a shooting".
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:22pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Have you checked this? http://kotaku.com/5022241/psp-at-the-center-of-florida-shooting
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:30am gameman9: I though Jack Thompson was banned.
Posted 07/05/08 at 08:30am sqlrob: metal is right. That metal just happens to be mercuryt
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:58am eraserheadthelynch: mental
The school administration’s complete about-turn in the face of moral panic is what irks most people.
Exactly.
I was just up there last weekend for a function at RPI, I'm annoyed with myself for failing to look into how this was playing out.
@ tony selby
they arn’t actually suing over the incident at the school, as you stated, they really didn’t do anything illegal, their finacial backers complained threated to pull funding so they folded, sucks for the exhibit but nothing really wrong there
See above. They didn't do anything illegal, technically, but it was definitely wrong. They had no "moral outrage" or "discomfort with the exhibit" when they invited him, KNOWING the content of said exhibit. They canceled after the fact, after the Young Republicans club saw the exhibit and started in with their demented bleating about RPI being a "terrorist haven".