Submitted by JC - May 9, 2008 at 9:16 am -050067.11.42.155
I agree wholeheartedly with this. It seems any time they try to pass a law that would restrict someone’s access to something, the holy scripture of the constitution is trotted out.
The Constitution is basically holy. If you don't understand that, you're either not a US citizen, or you shouldn't be one.
I fail to see how this in any way is unconstitutional.
You fail at reading then. It breaks several amendments, that's the term of unconstitutional.
As I said in another post, it’s sad that we have to pass laws requiring retailers to do what they should be doing in the first place, but that’s what happens when you put the almighty dollar ahead of being a good corporate citizen.
It isn't sad that we have to do it. It is sad that its being attempted to be passed to hope to look good in the face of the ignorant public based off of speculation and fear.
Good corporate citizen? There's no such thing, please quit trying to joke.
These politicians would sell you down the river if it made them a dollar at your expense. Don't talk about "good corporate citizens".
All you people whining about this are not looking at the plus side.
There is no plus side.
The CCA took the bullseye off the comic book industry and parents and politicians started looking for something else to blame.
At the expense of that medium basically going to crap? That's not a plus.
The video game industry needs a similar deflection tactic. The ESRB ratings system hasn’t done it, this might be the ticket to get people looking in other directions (like maybe they’ll finally figure out the common thread between the 50s and today is bad parenting… one can hope).
Passing a law to hope things work doesn't do ****. Look at how they treated the FTC findings, they scoffed at them. The most likely situation will just involve other forms of dealing and untaxed money being passed. A really bad scenario would be a fresh employee buying the game for himself and this'll fine the retailer or himself.
This doesn't even involve the enforcement. Police officers being forced to stay staring at a register to not stop something harmful like cigarettes from getting to kids but a damn game with cartoon violence on it?
The word "adult content" is overly vague, and in the minds of the PTC waggling to hit someone can be labeled as "adult content" because of the violence being simulated. Do you understand how screwed up it be if a kid bought a Wii and Wii sports is said to have adult content because of the Mii variations or the violence in Wii boxing?
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Posted 07/05/08 at 03:27pm Silencets: I'm sure JT had a perfectly good reason sending gay porn....It'll come to me any day now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:54pm Grendal: once you send gay porn to judges, I'm comfortable calling you crazy
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:46pm eraserheadthelynch: I dont think hes crazy but his values and social skills are slightly wrack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:38pm Grendal: Jacks actually a really good example of how not to deal with your mental illness and what can happen if it goes untreated
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:37pm Grendal: Well most people with a mental illness admit it and get help instead of trolling a website for their ego ala jack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:32pm BlackIce: True, that does explain why the Patriot Act is legal, but..
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:21pm Grendal: As far as I know theres no law banning people with mental illness from holding jobs as lawyers or judges
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:40pm BlackIce: Sadly, the law banning Mentals from any sort of important job isn't well enforced. Therefore, Jackie is still a "Lawyer".
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:23pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack Thompson is drooling right now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:23pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: "Two teens were apparently arguing over a Sony PSP in Jacksonville, Florida ended in a shooting".
Posted 07/05/08 at 12:22pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Have you checked this? http://kotaku.com/5022241/psp-at-the-center-of-florida-shooting
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:30am gameman9: I though Jack Thompson was banned.
Posted 07/05/08 at 08:30am sqlrob: metal is right. That metal just happens to be mercuryt
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:58am eraserheadthelynch: mental
The Constitution is basically holy. If you don't understand that, you're either not a US citizen, or you shouldn't be one.
I fail to see how this in any way is unconstitutional.
You fail at reading then. It breaks several amendments, that's the term of unconstitutional.
As I said in another post, it’s sad that we have to pass laws requiring retailers to do what they should be doing in the first place, but that’s what happens when you put the almighty dollar ahead of being a good corporate citizen.
It isn't sad that we have to do it. It is sad that its being attempted to be passed to hope to look good in the face of the ignorant public based off of speculation and fear.
Good corporate citizen? There's no such thing, please quit trying to joke.
These politicians would sell you down the river if it made them a dollar at your expense. Don't talk about "good corporate citizens".
All you people whining about this are not looking at the plus side.
There is no plus side.
The CCA took the bullseye off the comic book industry and parents and politicians started looking for something else to blame.
At the expense of that medium basically going to crap? That's not a plus.
The video game industry needs a similar deflection tactic. The ESRB ratings system hasn’t done it, this might be the ticket to get people looking in other directions (like maybe they’ll finally figure out the common thread between the 50s and today is bad parenting… one can hope).
Passing a law to hope things work doesn't do ****. Look at how they treated the FTC findings, they scoffed at them. The most likely situation will just involve other forms of dealing and untaxed money being passed. A really bad scenario would be a fresh employee buying the game for himself and this'll fine the retailer or himself.
This doesn't even involve the enforcement. Police officers being forced to stay staring at a register to not stop something harmful like cigarettes from getting to kids but a damn game with cartoon violence on it?
The word "adult content" is overly vague, and in the minds of the PTC waggling to hit someone can be labeled as "adult content" because of the violence being simulated. Do you understand how screwed up it be if a kid bought a Wii and Wii sports is said to have adult content because of the Mii variations or the violence in Wii boxing?