Where Politics And Video Games Collide

"It’s putting power back in the hands of parents in a world where any kid can ride their bike out to the nearest store, buy something, and go home without their parents knowing at all."

Where do they get the money to do this? Hmmm? Hand your kid 60 bucks, and you've just ceded parental responsibility. A parent has EVERY tool, power and authority to monitor the games their kids play already.

Pornography exists across all media types, so your argument is null from the start, but I'll humor it. Pornographic video games are already regulated under current law, so again, there is no need for additional laws. The argument is about whether this current bill is needed and/or unconstitutional, not about the state of media laws in general.

"Additionally, your ideas about the “foundation of our freedom” are complete fictions. Many things which are not proven to pose a danger to children are already banned."

I've already addressed the, "Other things are inffectually banned, so why not one more?" point. Fiction? How so. Especially under the light that any supposed harm to children is utter fiction. You really have no counter to this.

Putting power back into the hands of parents? No, this law just tries to do their job for them - which simply adds to the cycle of laziness that pervades the modern parental state.

"[This law] has nothing to do with danger, real or imaginary."

Yes, it has everything to do with it, and your insistance to the contrary means you have little grasp on how and why laws exist, how our legal system works, and the basis of the constitutional law which protects video games and mixes this attempt to regulate them.

If something poses no danger, then there is no reason to pass a law to regulate it.