Submitted by Brer - October 30, 2006 at 2:17 pm -0500129.82.208.170
@Boffo97
An accusation of homophobia is not an assertion that that person suffers from mental illness, so your accusation of hypocrisy is entirely groundless. It's an accusation of irrational fear. Also, if you'll consult the dictionary you'll find that a phobia is also synonymous for a strong aversion or atavistic reaction to something...such as the "disgust" you mention. In any case, the key descriptor is -irrational-, the point being that people disapproving of or reacting with disgust, fear, or hatret to homosexuality are being accused of doing so without the backing of either rational or empirical evidence.
@Benji
Again, there isn't enough here for a successful charge of defamation. Due to our free speech protections the standards that have to be met to prove defamatory speech are very high, and there are a lot of exceptions. The simplest one that's relevant here is simply that you can't be guilty of libel or slander by stating your opinion. That Thompson -thinks- male-male kissing is harmful to minors is his opinion and is therefore protected. Now if he made specific factual claims about the nature of the homosexual content of the game (which he hasn't, he's simply stated that there's "homosexual activity" which is true, strictly speaking) and they were proved to be A) false and B) made with foreknowledge that they were false AND the intent to cause harm, then -maybe- he could be sued.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:04pm Freyar: I demand to see this letter! (Not that I have any grounds to demand on.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:53pm gamepolitics: JT called me a "sock puppet" in an e-mail to Hal Halpin... i gave him 24 hours to retract it, LOL
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:46pm Haggard: Might want to take a look at what Anthony Horowitz wrote about GTA IV in the Telegraph, article seems to have been taken down
Posted 07/23/08 at 01:05pm Silencets: Beutiful. I always did wonder about Jacko Wacko
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:24am Matriculated: So Jack (an anti-gay activist) PAYED for gay porn
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:22am Matriculated: [i]...and purchased membership.[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:21am Matriculated: [i] few months later, as part of his ongoing campaign against Kent, Thompson followed links to gay porn on Kent's website[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:40am sortableturnip: Jack's at it again: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2008/07/jack_thompson_faces_permanent.php
Posted 07/22/08 at 11:22pm PHOENIXZERO: Ugh, that CNBC program "Play to Win" is it? Is on again...
An accusation of homophobia is not an assertion that that person suffers from mental illness, so your accusation of hypocrisy is entirely groundless. It's an accusation of irrational fear. Also, if you'll consult the dictionary you'll find that a phobia is also synonymous for a strong aversion or atavistic reaction to something...such as the "disgust" you mention. In any case, the key descriptor is -irrational-, the point being that people disapproving of or reacting with disgust, fear, or hatret to homosexuality are being accused of doing so without the backing of either rational or empirical evidence.
@Benji
Again, there isn't enough here for a successful charge of defamation. Due to our free speech protections the standards that have to be met to prove defamatory speech are very high, and there are a lot of exceptions. The simplest one that's relevant here is simply that you can't be guilty of libel or slander by stating your opinion. That Thompson -thinks- male-male kissing is harmful to minors is his opinion and is therefore protected. Now if he made specific factual claims about the nature of the homosexual content of the game (which he hasn't, he's simply stated that there's "homosexual activity" which is true, strictly speaking) and they were proved to be A) false and B) made with foreknowledge that they were false AND the intent to cause harm, then -maybe- he could be sued.