Submitted by illspirit - January 5, 2007 at 7:07 pm -050024.253.134.12
Good for the sponsors. No, really, good for them. Welcome to the free market and stuff.
This isn't censorship, this is about whoever is paying the bills getting to decide how their (and their stockholders') money is spent. Don't like it? Sponsor the event yourself. Or go start your own event to show off SCMRPG or whatever. And while you're at it, boycott whichever companies pulled the plug. The free market is a two-way street, after all. ;)
@Yuki-
Umm, I know you mean well, but you can't sue somebody because they don't want to give you their money for something they don't want to support. No matter how absurd their reason for it is.
Furthermore, it's the promoters own damn fault for either not telling the sponsors what they were in for, or not putting a clause in the contract preventing them from pulling out like this. Or, at the very least, for not finding enough sponsors/funds to be able to afford to tell picky sponsors to screw off.
Suing or blaming sponsors over this would only serve to exhibit the same personal responsibility deficiency syndrome which infects the think-of-the-children cultists...
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:38am tallimar: hmm... youre right, im not getting the right mind frame... "YOU WILL LIKE FRIES WITH THAT!" how's that?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:36am gameman9: Nah, he will just scare the customers.
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:35am tallimar: i think jack's new line may end up being "would you like fries with that?"
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:00am Adamas Draconis: His fave line. Always thought it should be "They've got me right where I want them."
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:43am gamepolitics: he's got 'em right where he wants 'em,LOL
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:30am Silencets: It was a great idea. Just another step in the overarcing master plan off JT...we little people wouldn't understand....
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:35am Jack Wessels: Yeah I knew that part. I'm just amazed at whatever thought process led him to think that was a good idea.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:33am gamepolitics: actually, he also sent similar material to the FL Supreme Court about 6 months before that
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:24am Jack Wessels: for him and would somehow get Kent in trouble.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:23am Jack Wessels: @GP: Wow, I've skimmed that one before, but I never noticed that JT actually thought this was good news....
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Posted 07/05/08 at 03:27pm Silencets: I'm sure JT had a perfectly good reason sending gay porn....It'll come to me any day now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:54pm Grendal: once you send gay porn to judges, I'm comfortable calling you crazy
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:46pm eraserheadthelynch: I dont think hes crazy but his values and social skills are slightly wrack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:38pm Grendal: Jacks actually a really good example of how not to deal with your mental illness and what can happen if it goes untreated
This isn't censorship, this is about whoever is paying the bills getting to decide how their (and their stockholders') money is spent. Don't like it? Sponsor the event yourself. Or go start your own event to show off SCMRPG or whatever. And while you're at it, boycott whichever companies pulled the plug. The free market is a two-way street, after all. ;)
@Yuki-
Umm, I know you mean well, but you can't sue somebody because they don't want to give you their money for something they don't want to support. No matter how absurd their reason for it is.
Furthermore, it's the promoters own damn fault for either not telling the sponsors what they were in for, or not putting a clause in the contract preventing them from pulling out like this. Or, at the very least, for not finding enough sponsors/funds to be able to afford to tell picky sponsors to screw off.
Suing or blaming sponsors over this would only serve to exhibit the same personal responsibility deficiency syndrome which infects the think-of-the-children cultists...