I forgot to add this, but I'd like to share a story that I think is an argument that can be used in terms of whats good about video games and how families can use video games to bring them together instead of alienating their children and making them out to be violent murderers.

I was flying Battlefield 2 one day and I was running to get to a plan (Kubra Dam US side in case you're wondering) and there were two guys there with a similar name with the same clan tag. The only difference in their names was Sr and Jr..but because the names were weird to begin with I didn't figure out what it meant. But to make things easier lets call them JohnnyJR and JohnnySR

Anyways I go to grab the plan [I'm in the same squad as them so we have voice contact], but the JohnnySR gets in and I stop to allow JohnnyJR to get in because they are clan mates and whatnot.

He tells me on voice chat its ok I can get and asks do I want to pilot or co-pilot and I say how come hes called me to get in the plan and he says "My son is afk, hes eating dinner."

I finally figure out what the JR and SR meant and I'm just flabbergasted....and I astonishingly ask "You play games with your son" and he answers "Yea my daughter plays with us too shes just not on" ...I'm still in shock of course because since I discovered gaming as a kid I wanted nothing more then my dad to play with me.

Of course he developed a disdain or even hate for all things gaming and computer because he saw me spending so much time on it instead of "socializing" or playing some sport and him playing games would be impossible.

Then of course I tell the guy in the plane that I'm really jeleous and that his kids are very lucky. He tells me that he's divorced and games allow him to bond with his children. So even though he's not the primary caregiver the bonds with his children and him are stronger then them with their mother. They even started a family clan.

I ask how old he is because I'm thinking hes like a young father, 25 and he says 40.




The point of the story is that games can do a lot more good then you'd expect, and if some parents were wiling to put their own prejudices aside and taking interest in what their kids are interested in, and take interest in their kids lives they could be a lot closer to their children then you could ever expect. Kids/Teens would communicate with their parents easily and would confide in them if they shared and experienced some common interests on a regular basis.

But in todays world parents often look for the easy answer, a scapegoat, something convenient to explain why their children are so distant from them and why they can't relate with their children and politicians abuse that and only end up drawing lines in the sand that further separate parents from their children, instead of bringing them together.

Reply

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am
E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am
sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am
sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm
LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm
gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm
GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm
Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm
Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:04pm
Freyar: I demand to see this letter! (Not that I have any grounds to demand on.)
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:53pm
gamepolitics: JT called me a "sock puppet" in an e-mail to Hal Halpin... i gave him 24 hours to retract it, LOL
Posted 07/23/08 at 02:46pm
Haggard: Might want to take a look at what Anthony Horowitz wrote about GTA IV in the Telegraph, article seems to have been taken down
Posted 07/23/08 at 01:05pm
Silencets: Beutiful. I always did wonder about Jacko Wacko
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:24am
Matriculated: So Jack (an anti-gay activist) PAYED for gay porn
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:22am
Matriculated: [i]...and purchased membership.[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:21am
Matriculated: [i] few months later, as part of his ongoing campaign against Kent, Thompson followed links to gay porn on Kent's website[/i]
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:40am
sortableturnip: Jack's at it again: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2008/07/jack_thompson_faces_permanent.php
Login or register to post shouts