Submitted by Mauler - February 26, 2007 at 11:41 pm -050024.4.225.73
If the courts said that Blizzard can't act against WOWGlider, it's creator or their customers (a part you didn't include) then that would mean they could not ban for it.
The baseball anology falls short because the act doesn't interfere with the contractual relationship between the player and a third party. While it could ruin sales, even in the short term, the player and the steriod supplier isn't doing it with the explicit desire to violate the contract. Actually, the opposite is more likely true. A baseball player on steriods hits more homeruns and becomes more marketable. The football player on 'roids gets more sacks and wins defensive player of the year despite being suspended for 4 games. His marketability is unaffected.
The proper sports anology is what the NFL and MLB call tampering since the elements of the offense are the same. You have someone under contract and someone is trying to interfere with that contractual relationship. The NFL, a number of years ago, hit Carmen Policy while he was with the Browns with a 10K fine for hinting that he might be interested in Mike Holmgren as a head coach while Holmgren was still under contract with the Packers.
The gun anology fails because the contractual relationship between the maker of the gun and buyer of the gun is completed upon sale. Blizzard has a continuing relationship with all of their current subscriber. Sports works well for the right anology and tampering fits the bill.
Posted 07/09/08 at 12:40am Jack Wessels: @PHOENIXZERO: Do you really think that would stop him?
Posted 07/09/08 at 12:29am PHOENIXZERO: Wonder if Jack ever got the memo that attacking a judge, especially the one who presided over your own hearing will only make him look worse.
Posted 07/08/08 at 11:10pm Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : Dennis you should post that story about JT insulting Judge Tunis. There might be more you could find that Kotaku missed.
Posted 07/08/08 at 08:32pm lordlundar: Jack should realize that when you call everyone crazy, then the only crazy one is the you.
Posted 07/08/08 at 06:06pm DarkTetsuya: @GP I just fear for the safety of your fax machine cause you didn't post it :P
Posted 07/08/08 at 06:02pm PHOENIXZERO: @Krono Yeah, that's probably where it came from. Don't remember if a source was mentioned. Other than it being called a "story" or "study".
Posted 07/08/08 at 06:02pm PHOENIXZERO: Because I was bored and channel surfing. =(
Posted 07/08/08 at 05:59pm GRIZZAM PRIME: PHEONIXZERO, Why the hell are you watching CNN's sodomy butt baby(HLN)?
Posted 07/08/08 at 05:53pm Krono: @PHOENIXZERO: Would that be the AP story about how schools should teach 11+ year old how to avoid abusive datings relationships?
Posted 07/08/08 at 05:34pm PHOENIXZERO: Oh joy, new subject and they bring out Cooper Lawrence who takes a mention about videogames. It's a segment called "Sex Normal for 11-Year-Olds" having to do more so with mental and physical abuse in "relationships" of 11-14 year olds and not sex. >_<
Posted 07/08/08 at 05:28pm PHOENIXZERO: Certainly a stupid segment with their "adolescent psychologist" and a game is different than a movie. Two callers, underwhelming. >_>
Posted 07/08/08 at 05:24pm PHOENIXZERO: CNN has wanted to be Fox Jr since Fox started spanking them in the ratings and Turner was removed from power.
Posted 07/08/08 at 05:11pm PHOENIXZERO: UGH, they have the CT AG on there... He sounds like Jack.
Posted 07/08/08 at 05:09pm PHOENIXZERO: >_> You can call in 1-800-TELL-HLN.
Posted 07/08/08 at 05:09pm PHOENIXZERO: CNN HLN is doing a segment on Beer Pong with their other "morality" blowhard Mike Galanos.
Posted 07/08/08 at 03:47pm Jabrwock: This just in! Jack insults someone. News@11
Posted 07/08/08 at 03:44pm mogbert: I think we can skip that story, we can't cover JT every time he insults someone, we would run out of server space...
Posted 07/08/08 at 03:43pm gamepolitics: nah, intentionally didn't post that... it's just a publicity grab... I only have so much JT tolerance, save 4 more relevant news
Posted 07/08/08 at 02:57pm Xlorep DarkHelm: Dennis doesn't post every little tidbit of information about Whacky-Jacky.
Posted 07/08/08 at 02:52pm DarkTetsuya: freak4all: I just posted that ... but yeah they did
The baseball anology falls short because the act doesn't interfere with the contractual relationship between the player and a third party. While it could ruin sales, even in the short term, the player and the steriod supplier isn't doing it with the explicit desire to violate the contract. Actually, the opposite is more likely true. A baseball player on steriods hits more homeruns and becomes more marketable. The football player on 'roids gets more sacks and wins defensive player of the year despite being suspended for 4 games. His marketability is unaffected.
The proper sports anology is what the NFL and MLB call tampering since the elements of the offense are the same. You have someone under contract and someone is trying to interfere with that contractual relationship. The NFL, a number of years ago, hit Carmen Policy while he was with the Browns with a 10K fine for hinting that he might be interested in Mike Holmgren as a head coach while Holmgren was still under contract with the Packers.
The gun anology fails because the contractual relationship between the maker of the gun and buyer of the gun is completed upon sale. Blizzard has a continuing relationship with all of their current subscriber. Sports works well for the right anology and tampering fits the bill.