Submitted by Andrew Eisen - March 13, 2007 at 12:47 pm -0500166.90.14.254
Okay, yeah the bill is absurd but the justification is even worse.
“video games include much repetition and with repetition comes a behavioral rehearsal for violent activity as violent games are played over and over again”
“As children play these games on a daily basis, it may cause some of them to lose touch with reality.”
“Specifically, in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City women are brutally murdered and are portrayed as prostitutes. Videos such as these promote the raping of a woman as entertainment and give players points as rewards for evading police after committing these heinous crimes.”
“in a study of 600 parents and teachers tested, less than three percent had any knowledge of the extent of violence depicted and the level of violence against women contained in the games.”
Interesting statistic in light of the fact that the bill’s authors themselves have no idea what is actually in the games they’re demonizing.
“Further, a mandatory warning label will function as a crucial reminder to those parents or guardians who would otherwise be unaware of the violent content contained in the video games.”
Really? If parents don’t see the label on the front and back of the box, in the store, and in the TV and magazine ads, what makes you think they’ll pay any attention to this one?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:00am Adamas Draconis: His fave line. Always thought it should be "They've got me right where I want them."
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:43am gamepolitics: he's got 'em right where he wants 'em,LOL
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:30am Silencets: It was a great idea. Just another step in the overarcing master plan off JT...we little people wouldn't understand....
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:35am Jack Wessels: Yeah I knew that part. I'm just amazed at whatever thought process led him to think that was a good idea.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:33am gamepolitics: actually, he also sent similar material to the FL Supreme Court about 6 months before that
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:24am Jack Wessels: for him and would somehow get Kent in trouble.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:23am Jack Wessels: @GP: Wow, I've skimmed that one before, but I never noticed that JT actually thought this was good news....
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Posted 07/05/08 at 03:27pm Silencets: I'm sure JT had a perfectly good reason sending gay porn....It'll come to me any day now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:54pm Grendal: once you send gay porn to judges, I'm comfortable calling you crazy
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:46pm eraserheadthelynch: I dont think hes crazy but his values and social skills are slightly wrack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:38pm Grendal: Jacks actually a really good example of how not to deal with your mental illness and what can happen if it goes untreated
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:37pm Grendal: Well most people with a mental illness admit it and get help instead of trolling a website for their ego ala jack
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:32pm BlackIce: True, that does explain why the Patriot Act is legal, but..
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:21pm Grendal: As far as I know theres no law banning people with mental illness from holding jobs as lawyers or judges
“video games include much repetition and with repetition comes a behavioral rehearsal for violent activity as violent games are played over and over again”
“As children play these games on a daily basis, it may cause some of them to lose touch with reality.”
“Specifically, in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City women are brutally murdered and are portrayed as prostitutes. Videos such as these promote the raping of a woman as entertainment and give players points as rewards for evading police after committing these heinous crimes.”
“in a study of 600 parents and teachers tested, less than three percent had any knowledge of the extent of violence depicted and the level of violence against women contained in the games.”
Interesting statistic in light of the fact that the bill’s authors themselves have no idea what is actually in the games they’re demonizing.
“Further, a mandatory warning label will function as a crucial reminder to those parents or guardians who would otherwise be unaware of the violent content contained in the video games.”
Really? If parents don’t see the label on the front and back of the box, in the store, and in the TV and magazine ads, what makes you think they’ll pay any attention to this one?
Andrew Eisen