Submitted by nightwng2000 - March 13, 2007 at 11:23 am -0500216.48.44.103
I think the motivation behind the "unrated games" isn't merely an issue of games that preceeded the ESRB rating system. The bill can really only control brick and mortar retailers. So even free games or online independants may be excluded for the most part.
It's more likely an attempt to do something about "pre-orders". However, if that is the case, then it's further evidence of lack of intelligence on the part of the creators of this bill.
A game that is "RP" can still be pre-ordered from a variety of sources. No actual product is delivered into the hands of the person doing the pre-order. In most, or at least many cases, a retailer that has an age limit policy will require ID to actually receive the item. It's also true that in most, if not all cases, by the time of publish and delivery of the title to the retailer, the ESRB has officially rated the product.
Therefore, that section of the bill is nothing more than a political stunt to misinform the general public about the issue of ESRB ratings as well as a sign of the lack of knowledge and comprehension on the parts of the politicians on the subject of video games and their nature (industry, content, effect, etc).
Posted 07/24/08 at 01:45pm Dark Sovereign: A fitting metaphor lumi
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:21am lumi: their own. Looks like they're arguing with ghosts...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am lumi: Ooh, and to prove the validity of their arguments, they've deleted all the comments from the gamers/outsiders, and just left
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am lumi: Wow...there's worse invective and vitriol on that first feminist site's comments than in most gaming forums I've read...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:19am SimonBob: You guys can read the feminist blogs? One of 'em has over 1400 comments -- my browser locks up when I try to load the page!
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:49am M. Carusi: That's probably the message to describe hardcore feminism in general. :P
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:35am Tom90deg: Meh, it seems like most of the comments are "I'm right, and it you don't agree with me, you're a girl-hating masonogystic pig!"
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:30am M. Carusi: Those comment walls on the feminist blogs complaining about FP are generating some hilarious content.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
It's more likely an attempt to do something about "pre-orders". However, if that is the case, then it's further evidence of lack of intelligence on the part of the creators of this bill.
A game that is "RP" can still be pre-ordered from a variety of sources. No actual product is delivered into the hands of the person doing the pre-order. In most, or at least many cases, a retailer that has an age limit policy will require ID to actually receive the item. It's also true that in most, if not all cases, by the time of publish and delivery of the title to the retailer, the ESRB has officially rated the product.
Therefore, that section of the bill is nothing more than a political stunt to misinform the general public about the issue of ESRB ratings as well as a sign of the lack of knowledge and comprehension on the parts of the politicians on the subject of video games and their nature (industry, content, effect, etc).
nightwng2000
NW2K Software