Submitted by Beacon - March 13, 2007 at 10:46 am -0500132.239.106.242
Okay, first of all, the whole "confiscating unrated games" part... there's some feel-good, do-nothing legislation. Most retailers won't carry a game in the first place unless it's got an ESRB rating. As others have said before, the only games this would effect are old SNES games and the like.
@Robb. I'm pretty sure the confiscation only applies to retailers. You wouldn't be able to raid a home for it. It won't affect downloadable games, either, since online transactions are not technnically carried out in NYC.
As for the reviewing period. Not good. Either A) this would require the retailers to maintain multiple kioscs with every game available on them, B) every company would need to make a releasable demo of any game they make, or C) stores would have to lend out games. Either way this results in a major increase in costs for either the game developers or the retailers. That's not good for anybody.
Posted 07/04/08 at 03:38pm Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : (I know that was late but better late than never.)
Posted 07/04/08 at 03:38pm Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : Everyone! Quick! Repent! The Apocalypse approaches! Jack Thompson has been honored for his deeds! *screams and faints*
Posted 07/04/08 at 03:12pm JustChris: The parade was a false hope for jack...an ego boost is an ego boost.
Posted 07/04/08 at 02:33pm Silencets: Read the comments in the Editorial...JT himself in all of his asinine glory was there, as well as details on the parade
Posted 07/04/08 at 02:24pm BlackIce: What?
Posted 07/04/08 at 01:59pm Silencets: I still can't believe JT was in a parade...
Posted 07/04/08 at 11:01am BlackIce: Frank, I watch that when contemplating armed robbery.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:49am ZippyDSM: Monolith: get a name yet? *yawns* was no on much yestersday.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:45am Frank: To prepare myself for the agony of writing a long reply I'm watching that clip from FOX news about the torture game 2.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:43am Frank: After reading Jack's reply I think that at some point today I'm gonna have to give him my own reply.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:42am eraserheadthelynch: i think noel was on super skunk [cannabis] himself when he made that comment
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:24am Jack Wessels: Haha, Thompson finally replied to the edatorial. Much lulz.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:20am gamepolitics: heh... GP is like a shark. Can never stop.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:19am Belgarion89: @GP Dude, they made you work on the 4th? That's harsh!
Posted 07/04/08 at 09:24am eraserheadthelynch: GOD BLESS AMERICA HAPPY 4TH[even though England is better
Posted 07/04/08 at 07:48am beemoh: @ConstantNeophyte: Of course! It's not games that turn people into killers, it's kills that turn people into gamers!
Posted 07/04/08 at 05:47am GRIZZAM PRIME: Happy 4th of July!!!
Posted 07/04/08 at 12:56am eraserheadthelynch: @ConstantNeophyte i thought it was a parady when i read that wow thats so dumb
Posted 07/04/08 at 12:04am Frank: I figured out something more "horrible" then the tortue game two. First read about Jack Thompson then watch Fox news.
Posted 07/04/08 at 12:03am Frank: The day that happens will be a great day in video game history.
@Robb. I'm pretty sure the confiscation only applies to retailers. You wouldn't be able to raid a home for it. It won't affect downloadable games, either, since online transactions are not technnically carried out in NYC.
As for the reviewing period. Not good. Either A) this would require the retailers to maintain multiple kioscs with every game available on them, B) every company would need to make a releasable demo of any game they make, or C) stores would have to lend out games. Either way this results in a major increase in costs for either the game developers or the retailers. That's not good for anybody.