Enter your GamePolitics username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Login
Sign in using Facebook
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaCrashI am reminded of the saying about playing chess with a pigeon.08/01/2015 - 11:13am
Andrew EisenThis is supported by, well, what actually happened, but also the text of the actual leaks. That was Tito's question and what he and a few (four total, I think) were discussing.08/01/2015 - 11:11am
Andrew EisenNo, it's not. What was generally prohibited was not discussion of journalistic ethics or other GamerGate topics, but threads that were, for example, discussing the sex life of an indie developer. THOSE are what were locked and removed.08/01/2015 - 11:10am
Goth_SkunkI don't believe you. Not for a second. Every major site with the exception of the Escapist prohibited discussion of GamerGate in its early stages. That is a fact.08/01/2015 - 11:04am
Andrew EisenNo, that's a fact. Don't believe me, read 'em yourself. No one was trying to censor discussion of GamerGate.08/01/2015 - 11:02am
Goth_Skunk@Andrew: That's your opinion.08/01/2015 - 10:57am
Goth_Skunkfuture? I'd compensate you for your time, of course.08/01/2015 - 10:57am
Goth_Skunk@IronPatriot: Congratulations on a sweeping statement to remove the agency of people supporting GamerGate for their own individual reasons. Since you're so good at painting in such broad strokes, are you free to paint my apartment sometime in the near08/01/2015 - 10:57am
Andrew EisenWhich, as you can tell by actually reading the snippets that were leaked, is a shamefully disingenuous telling of what was actually said.08/01/2015 - 10:56am
Goth_SkunkAdditionally, to quote William Usher, "[s]ome of the members on that list actively used their platform to support and propagate a wide-sweeping media narrative based on lies and factual inaccuracies."08/01/2015 - 10:54am
Goth_Skunkthe forums of The Escapist. Thankfully, they were both unsuccessful.08/01/2015 - 10:53am
Goth_SkunkOf the "Gamers Are Dead" articles specifically, no. But the list was used to try and censor discussion about GamerGate in its early stages. Ben Kuchera and our own James Fudge used it to solicit to Escapist then EiC Greg Tito to prevent discussion on08/01/2015 - 10:53am
IronPatriotCraig, you are right that gamergate is utter hypocrisy. Any story about it which lacks the context of gamergate's harassment origins FAILS ethics in journalism. LOL.08/01/2015 - 10:49am
IronPatriot@Goth_Skunk "citation needed"? Citation provided! Gamergate was created by 4chan harassers and ethics #ISyourShield08/01/2015 - 10:48am
Craig R.IP: Plenty of irony to go around with GG. But really, it's complete hypocrisy.08/01/2015 - 10:48am
Andrew EisenIf that assertion were true, it's nigh unfathomable that that conversation was not one of the ones leaked and published on Breitbart. Plus, as I pointed out earlier, only TWO of the Gamers Are Dead authors were on the Game Journo Pros list anyway.08/01/2015 - 10:48am
Craig R.Looks like he is, Andrew. Tinfoil wonders never cease.08/01/2015 - 10:45am
Non-entityAndrew: that's exactly what GamerGate has been claiming, yes. Private discussion groups apparently equal conspiracy.08/01/2015 - 10:44am
Andrew EisenGoth - Wait, wait, wait. Are you suggesting that the Gamers Are Dead articles are the result of a coordinated effort organized on the Game Journo Pros group?08/01/2015 - 10:38am
IronPatriotGamergate's private "interest" is harassing women. Their public lie is about "ethics"08/01/2015 - 10:36am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician